In 1948, Thomas Adidas of the University of Minnesota and others asked the question: "Wouldn't too much protein be a burden on the kidneys?" For more than 70 years, the relationship between protein and kidneys has been explored around the world, but there is still no clear answer. Ambiguous health issues are more likely to be the subject of media hype. In recent years, there have been many articles claiming that "excessive intake of protein is harmful to the kidneys". So, why is there still no clear answer? Because experiments to find this answer are ethically difficult to conduct.
As mentioned at the beginning of this book, clinical studies in which humans are subjects are divided into “interventional studies” that actively industry email list intervene subjects with experimental treatments, and “observational studies” that do not intervene and only observe changes in subjects Research". In order to present a strong scientific basis (evidence), interventional research is necessary. Thus, to test whether consuming too much protein could harm the kidneys, the researchers had to randomly select subjects, divide them into groups that ate high amounts of protein and those that ate normal amounts, and measure the effects of long-term intake.
As such, subjects who ingest high amounts of protein do run the risk of kidney damage. arrow_forward_iosunderstand more Powered by GliaStudio The main premise of clinical research is to maintain the health of the subjects, and it is not allowed to conduct research that may endanger the health of the subjects. Therefore, interventional studies investigating the relationship between proteins and the kidney are also unacceptable on ethical grounds. However, researchers will not be content with this situation. Because interventional studies are not available, many researchers are using large-scale observational studies in an effort to identify trend indicators to complement the gaps. extremely important renal mechanism